Publication Process
Article Admission and Publication Process
Book notices, reviews and translations to be submitted to LIBRI should base on a methodological study/work including original and new finds and approaches filling a gap in the field.
Articles submitted to LIBRI should not be published or submitted for publication in any other journal/book before, in order to be published in the journal. If an article already published in a journal/book before should be re-published in LIBRI with special causes, permission of the previous journal/book publishing house is required.
Articles to be submitted to LIBRI should be organized with proper “spelling rules”.
LIBRI: Journal of Book Notices, Reviews and Translations is an independent, non-profit, educational and cultural journal published by academicians.
Authors are responsible for the scientific content and clarity of their works in LIBRI; neither the journal nor the editors can be charged in this respect. The contents are open to users. All sorts of quotations are possible only with reference.
There is no fee requested for the articles submitted to LIBRI.
Open Access Policy
LIBRI: Journal of Book Notices, Reviews and Translations is an open access periodical all of the contents of which are open to users. The users can read, freely download, distribute and print the articles in full text, as well as giving link to the articles with reference, without requiring any permission from the publisher or the author(s).
Arbitration
Articles submitted to LIBRI are evaluated via the iThenticate programme to prevent plagiarism.
The arbitration process is “blind-review” and the articles are reviewed by two peers at least. If an article is discarded by a peer and approved by another, the Publishing Commission of the Journal scrutinizes the peer evaluations and decides either to appoint a third peer or return the article to the author. The article should have two approvals at least.
Arbitration Process
Editorial Process
Articles submitted to LIBRI is previously checked by the journal’s editor and/or editor-in-chief, whether it is relevant to the aim and scope of the journal. Afterwards, the article is evaluated via the iThenticate programme to measure the similarity analysis and to prevent plagiarism. Articles that are irrelevant or that fail the iThenticate evaluation, will be discarded.
Peer Review
The arbitration process is “blind-review” and the articles are reviewed by two peers at least. The peer review process is “double-blind”. The identities of both the author(s) and the peers are hidden to prevent the conflict of interest.
If an article is discarded by a peer and approved by another, the Publishing Commission of the Journal scrutinizes the peer evaluations and decides either to appoint a third peer or return the article to the author. The article should have two approvals at least.