{"id":4172,"date":"2019-01-18T13:21:44","date_gmt":"2019-01-18T11:21:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.libridergi.org\/2015-en\/trans-2015-en\/lbr-0176"},"modified":"2019-01-23T14:10:54","modified_gmt":"2019-01-23T12:10:54","slug":"lbr-0176","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.libridergi.org\/en\/2019-en\/lbr-0176","title":{"rendered":"Pro Rege Deiotaro\/Kral Deiotaros Savunmas\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\"\"<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div><\/figure>\u00a0<\/div>\n

Pro Rege Deiotaro\/Kral Deiotaros Savunmas\u0131<\/h2>\n

CICERO<\/h3>\n
<\/div>\n

ISBN:<\/strong> 9786059872508
\nPage:<\/strong>\u00a0126
\nPublication Date:<\/strong>\u00a02017
\nLocation:<\/strong> \u0130stanbul
\nPublisher:\u00a0<\/strong>Kabalc\u0131 Yay\u0131nevi<\/p><\/div>

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

LIBRI<\/em>\u00a0V (2019) 1-5<\/strong>
\nReceived Date<\/strong>: 28.12.2018 | Acceptance Date<\/strong>: 06.01.2019
\nOnline Publication Date<\/strong>: 17.01.2019
\nCopyright \u00a9 Journal of Book Notices, Reviews and Translations, 2019<\/p>\n

<\/div><\/div>\n
\n\t
\n\t\t\n

\"pdf\"\u00a0\u00a0Get PDF<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"references\"\u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0View PDF<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"info\"\u00a0\u00a0<\/a>Citation<\/a>
\n<\/b><\/p>\n

\n\t\t

<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>
<\/div>\n

CICERO, Pro Rege Deiotaro\/Kral Deiotaros Savunmas\u0131<\/em>. \u0130stanbul 2017. Kabalc\u0131 Yay\u0131nevi, 126 sayfa. \u00c7ev. E. N. AKDO\u011eDU-ARCA. ISBN: 9786059872508<\/strong><\/p>\n

Orta \u0130talya\u2019daki Arpinum kasabas\u0131nda, equites<\/em> s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131na mensup bir ailede d\u00fcnyaya gelen Marcus Tullius Cicero, M\u00d6 63 y\u0131l\u0131nda Roma\u2019da consul<\/em> se\u00e7ildi\u00ad\u011finde 43 ya\u015f\u0131ndayd\u0131. Roma devlet d\u00fczeninde en \u00fcst memuriyeti ifade eden bu makama se\u00e7ilmeden \u00f6nce, 23 ya\u015f\u0131ndayken avukatl\u0131k mesle\u011fine ad\u0131m at\u00adm\u0131\u015f ve zamanla Roma\u2019n\u0131n en \u00f6nemli hatiplerinden biri haline gelmi\u015fti. Elde etti\u011fi ba\u015far\u0131larla cursus honorum<\/em> kariyerinde s\u0131ras\u0131yla; M\u00d6 75 y\u0131l\u0131nda quaes\u00adtor<\/em>, M\u00d6 69 y\u0131l\u0131nda aedilis<\/em> ve M\u00d6 66 y\u0131l\u0131nda da praetor<\/em> g\u00f6revlerini y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00adm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Caesar\u2019\u0131n, emrindeki lejyonlarla 10 Ocak M\u00d6 49 tarihinde Rubicon Nehri\u2019ni ge\u00e7erek Roma\u2019ya y\u00fcr\u00fcmesi sonucu \u00e7\u0131kan \u0130\u00e7 Sava\u015f\u2019ta Pompeius\u2019un yan\u0131nda yer ald\u0131. Ancak Pompeius ve taraftarlar\u0131, 9 A\u011fustos M\u00d6 48\u2019de Phar\u00adsalos Sava\u015f\u0131\u2019nda Caesar\u2019\u0131n lejyonlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda yenilgiye u\u011frad\u0131lar. Sava\u015f\u0131n ard\u0131ndan Pompeius\u2019un yan\u0131nda yer alan bir\u00e7ok Romal\u0131 gibi Cicero da Caesar taraf\u0131ndan affedildi ve b\u00f6ylece yeniden Roma\u2019ya d\u00f6nd\u00fc. Caesar\u2019\u0131n 15 Mart M\u00d6 44 tarihinde suikaste kurban gitmesinin ard\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kan karga\u015fa orta\u00adm\u0131nda bu kez kazanan taraf olan Octavianus\u2019un yan\u0131nda yer ald\u0131. Ancak bu durum, Octavianus\u2019un da d\u00e2hil oldu\u011fu II. Triumvir<\/em> D\u00f6nemi (M\u00d6 43-27) ba\u015f\u00adlarken, M. Antonius\u2019un emriyle idam edilmesini engelleyemedi. \u0130dam\u0131n\u0131n ar\u00add\u0131ndan dili ve elleri, b\u00fcy\u00fck bir ironi \u00f6rne\u011fi olarak, zaman\u0131nda \u00e7ok say\u0131da et\u00adkileyici s\u00f6ylevler verdi\u011fi Senatus<\/em>\u2019un kap\u0131s\u0131na \u00e7ivilendi. Cicero\u2019nun, g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcze \u00f6nemli bilgilerin aktar\u0131lmas\u0131na vesile olan siyaset, felsefe ve retorik konulu eserlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, farkl\u0131 zamanlarda verdi\u011fi bir\u00e7ok kaydedilmi\u015f s\u00f6ylevi de bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Cicero\u2019nun Orationes Caesarianae<\/em> olarak isimlendirilen 3 s\u00f6ylevinden so\u00adnuncusu olan Pro Rege Deiotaro\/Kral Deiotaros Savumas\u0131<\/em>, Akdeniz \u00dcniversi\u00adtesi Edebiyat Fak\u00fcltesi Eski\u00e7a\u011f Dilleri ve K\u00fclt\u00fcrleri B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, Latin Dili ve Ede\u00adbiyat\u0131 Anabilim Dal\u0131 Dr. \u00d6\u011fr. \u00dcyesi Ebru N. Akdo\u011fu Arca taraf\u0131ndan T\u00fcrk\u00e7e\u2019ye kazand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kitab\u0131n ana b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc, M\u00d6 45 y\u0131l\u0131nda Galatia kral\u0131 ve Gala\u00adtia\u2019daki \u00fc\u00e7 tetrarkhes<\/em>\u2019ten biri olan Deiotaros\u2019a y\u00f6neltilmi\u015f su\u00e7lamalara kar\u015f\u0131 Cicero\u2019nun yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunma konu\u015fmas\u0131ndan olu\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Eser; \u00d6ns\u00f6z<\/em> (6-8), \u00c7eviri Y\u00f6ntemi<\/em> (9-10), Antik Eser K\u0131saltmalar\u0131<\/em> (11- 12) ve Di\u011fer K\u0131saltmalar<\/em> (13) b\u00f6l\u00fcmleriyle ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Giri\u015f<\/em> (14-44) b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc 5 alt b\u00f6l\u00fcme ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu alt b\u00f6l\u00fcmler; Pro Rege Deiotaro Oratio \u2013 Deiotaros \u00d6zelinde Metnin Ta\u00adrihsel \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi <\/em>(14-20), Cicero ve Caesar \u00d6zelinde Tarihsel Ardalan<\/em> (20-31), Metnin De\u011ferlendirilmesi<\/em> (23-31), Caesar\u2019\u0131n Deiotaros\u2019a \u0130li\u015fkin Karar\u0131<\/em> (31-34) ve Metnin Rhetorik \u00d6\u011feler ve Yarg\u0131lama Us\u00fclleri E\u015fli\u011finde \u0130rdelenmesi ve \u00d6zetlenmesi<\/em> (34-44) \u015feklinde isimlendirilmi\u015ftir. Pro Rege Deiotaro \u2013 Kral Deiotaros Savunmas\u0131<\/em> (48-95) isimli ana b\u00f6l\u00fcmdeki metnin Latince ve T\u00fcrk\u00e7e olarak sunuldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Kitap Son Notlar <\/em>(96-121) ve Kaynak\u00e7a<\/em> (122-126) b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile tamamlanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u00d6ns\u00f6z<\/em> (6-8) k\u0131sm\u0131nda Kral Deiotaros Savunmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finden ve di\u011fer T\u00fcrk\u00e7e \u00e7evirisinden bahsedilmekte, \u00e7evirinin amac\u0131 ifade edilmektedir. \u00c7eviri Y\u00f6ntemi<\/em> (9-10) k\u0131sm\u0131nda \u00e7eviride esas al\u0131nan kaynaklara ve edisyonda kulla\u00adn\u0131lan k\u0131saltmalara yer verilmi\u015ftir. Antik Eser K\u0131saltmalar\u0131<\/em> (11-13) ve Di\u011fer K\u0131\u00adsaltmalar<\/em> (13) k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131nda eserde yap\u0131lan k\u0131saltmalar a\u00e7\u0131klanmaktad\u0131r. Giri\u015f<\/em> (14-44) b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc 5 alt b\u00f6l\u00fcme ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Pro Rege Deiotaro Oratio \u2013 Deiota\u00adros \u00d6zelinde Metnin Tarihsel \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi <\/em>(14 -20) alt b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde, kral Deiotaros ile Roma ili\u015fkilerine de\u011finilmekte, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 beklentiler ve talepler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ili\u015fkinin geli\u015fimi anlat\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Cicero ve Caesar \u00d6zelinde Tarihsel Ardalan<\/em> (20 -31) alt b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde, Cicero\u2019nun Cilicia valili\u011fi s\u0131ras\u0131nda (M\u00d6 51-50), Deiotaros\u2019la irtibat\u0131, Caesar\u2019\u0131n M\u00d6 48 k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 \u0130skenderiye Sava\u015f\u0131 ile ge\u00e7irmesi\u00adnin ard\u0131ndan Suriye ve Karadeniz\u2019e ge\u00e7erek Mithradates VI Eupator\u2019un (M\u00d6 134-63) o\u011flu Pharnakes\u2019e kar\u015f\u0131 M\u00d6 2 A\u011fustos 47 tarihinde Zela\u2019da kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 zaferin ard\u0131ndan Roma\u2019ya d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fc aktar\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Metnin De\u011ferlendirilmesi<\/em> (23 \u2013 31) ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 alt b\u00f6l\u00fcmde, Pharsalos Muharebesi\u2019nden (M\u00d6 48) sonra Roma\u2019ya d\u00f6nen Cicero\u2019nun M\u00d6 46-45 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda verdi\u011fi s\u00f6ylevlere yer verilmektedir. Ard\u0131ndan Caesar konu\u015fmalar\u0131 orationes Caesarianae<\/em> olarak bi\u00adlinen s\u00f6ylevler hakk\u0131nda k\u0131saca bilgi verilmekte ve Cicero\u2019nun Deiotaros\u2019u sa\u00advunma stratejisi \u00fczerinde durulmaktad\u0131r. Cicero\u2019ya g\u00f6re kral\u0131n Pompeius\u2019un yan\u0131nda yer almas\u0131 bir hatad\u0131r error<\/em> ve bu hataya bir\u00e7ok ki\u015fi d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu durum, Caesar\u2019\u0131n \u00fcnl\u00fc clementia<\/em>\u2019s\u0131n\u0131 hak etmektedir. Alt b\u00f6l\u00fcmde ayr\u0131ca Deiotaros\u2019un savunmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcstlenen Cicero\u2019nun bu d\u00f6nemde Caesar ve yan\u00adda\u015flar\u0131na \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc ve temkinli bir tav\u0131rda yakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00fcstlendi\u011fi savunmalar\u0131n so\u00adnucunda dostlar\u0131n\u0131n Caesar taraf\u0131ndan Senatus<\/em>\u2019ta affedilmesi \u00fczerine, bir an i\u00e7in Roma Cumhuriyet D\u00f6nemi\u2019nin Senatus<\/em>\u2019una d\u00f6n\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc zannetmesi aktar\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 alt b\u00f6l\u00fcmde Deiotaros konu\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n uzunlu\u011fu hak\u00adk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmeler yer almaktad\u0131r. Caesar\u2019\u0131n Deiotaros\u2019a \u0130li\u015fkin Karar\u0131<\/em> (31-34) alt b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde, Ceasar\u2019\u0131n Deiotaros hakk\u0131ndaki karar\u0131n\u0131n bilin\u00admedi\u011fi, ancak nihayetinde kral\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmekte\u00addir. Metnin Retorik \u00d6\u011feler ve Yarg\u0131lama Us\u00fclleri E\u015fli\u011fi\u00adnde \u0130rdelenmesi ve \u00d6zetlenmesi<\/em> (34-44) alt b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde metnin retorik \u00f6zelliklerine de\u011finilmek suretiyle genel bir \u00f6zeti sunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

Pro Rege Deiotaro Kral Deiotaros Savunmas\u0131<\/em> (48-96) isimli b\u00f6l\u00fcmde met\u00adnin T\u00fcrk\u00e7e \u00e7evirisinin, Latince asl\u0131 ile birlikte sunuldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm, Metnin Rhetorik \u00d6\u011feler ve Yarg\u0131lama Us\u00fclleri E\u015fli\u011finde \u0130rdelenmesi ve \u00d6zetlenmesi<\/em> (34-44) alt b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde belirtildi\u011fi \u015fekilde; giri\u015f [exordium], anlat\u0131m [narratio], \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctme [reprehensio] ve sonu\u00e7 [conclusio] ayr\u0131mlar\u0131na uygun olarak tan\u0131t\u0131lacakt\u0131r. Savunman\u0131n giri\u015f [exordium] (48-55) k\u0131sm\u0131nda Ci\u00adcero, tecr\u00fcbesi ve ya\u015f\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu davada kendisini alt \u00fcst eden \u00e7ok \u015fey oldu\u011funu ifade ederek s\u00f6ze ba\u015flamaktad\u0131r. Deiotaros\u2019un hayati tehlikesi bu\u00adlunmaktad\u0131r ve bir kral\u0131n kellesinden daval\u0131 olmas\u0131<\/em> duyulmu\u015f \u015fey de\u011fildir. Ci\u00adcero, Senatus<\/em> taraf\u0131ndan bir\u00e7ok hizmeti nedeniyle ta\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lan kral\u0131n, \u015fimdi kendi torunu ve k\u00f6lesi taraf\u0131ndan su\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemektedir. Bu k\u0131s\u0131mda ayn\u0131 zamanda davan\u0131n yasal ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi \u00fczerinde de durulmaktad\u0131r; Roma\u2019da d\u00fc\u00adzenlenen yasalar\u0131n temelinde yer alan k\u00f6kl\u00fc gelene\u011fe g\u00f6re, Roma\u2019da bir k\u00f6le i\u015fkence alt\u0131nda olsa dahi efendisi aleyhine bir tav\u0131r i\u00e7inde bulunamaz. Dava\u00adn\u0131n yarg\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n ve davan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yerin de Cicero\u2019yu rahats\u0131z etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131l\u00admaktad\u0131r. Nitekim dava Caesar\u2019\u0131n yarg\u0131\u00e7l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ve Caesar\u2019\u0131n evinde g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00admektedir. Cicero, Caesar\u2019\u0131 \u00f6vmesine ra\u011fmen, kendi ya\u015fam\u0131na kastetti\u011fi iddia edilen birinin yarg\u0131\u00e7l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin g\u00fc\u00e7 olaca\u011f\u0131na de\u011finmektedir. Ci\u00adcero\u2019nun \u00fcst\u00fc kapal\u0131 olarak s\u00f6ylemeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 durum, Roma hukukunun te\u00admel team\u00fcl\u00fc olan \u2018hi\u00e7 kimse kendi davas\u0131nda yarg\u0131\u00e7 olamaz\u2019 nemo iudex in propia causa <\/em>ilkesinin \u00e7i\u011fnenmesidir. Bu t\u00fcr davalar\u0131n genelde forum Roma\u00adnum<\/em>\u2019da kalabal\u0131k e\u015fli\u011finde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc belirten Cicero, \u015fimdi Caesar\u2019\u0131n evinde ve sadece ikisinin oldu\u011fu bir mek\u00e2nda savunma yapacak olmas\u0131n\u0131n kendisini rahats\u0131z etti\u011finden bahsetmektedir. Burada yine gizli bir ele\u015ftiri bu\u00adlunmaktad\u0131r; davan\u0131n bu \u015fekilde g\u00f6r\u00fclmesinin krall\u0131k d\u00f6neminde yap\u0131lan bir uygulama oldu\u011fu bilinmektedir. Savunman\u0131n anlat\u0131m [narratio] (55-62) k\u0131s\u00adm\u0131nda Cicero, Caesar\u2019\u0131n Deiotaros\u2019a \u00f6fkesinin nedeni olarak g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, kral\u0131n Pompeius yanl\u0131s\u0131 tutumunun gerek\u00e7elerini ifade etmektedir. Deiotaros, Cae\u00adsar ile sava\u015fan Pompeius\u2019a yard\u0131mc\u0131 kuvvetlerini ya da hatta o\u011flunu<\/em> dahi g\u00f6n\u00addermi\u015fse<\/em> bile, bu tutumuyla sadece o anda bir\u00e7ok Romal\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7ine d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc duruma s\u00fcr\u00fcklenmi\u015fti. Cicero, ileti\u015fimsizlik nedeniyle Caesar\u2019\u0131n uzla\u015fma \u00e7a\u00adbalar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik hi\u00e7bir bilginin krala ula\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kral\u0131n da bu nedenle kendi \u00fclkesi i\u00e7in endi\u015felenerek Pompeius\u2019un yan\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Pharsalos Muha\u00adrebesi\u2019nden (M\u00d6 48) sonra Pompeius\u2019tan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u0130skenderiye ve Zela \u00e7ar\u00adp\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131nda ise (M\u00d6 48-47) Caesar\u2019\u0131 destekledi\u011fini ifade etmektedir. Savun\u00admada en geni\u015f yer ayr\u0131lan \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctme [reprehensio] (63-91) k\u0131sm\u0131nda ise Cicero, Deiotaros\u2019a y\u00f6neltilen su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n tutars\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsetmektedir. Esas su\u00e7lama, Deiotaros\u2019un \u0130skenderiye Sava\u015f\u0131 sonras\u0131nda Bloukion Saray\u0131\u2019nda ko\u00adnuk etti\u011fi Caesar\u2019a iki kez suikast giri\u015fiminde bulunmu\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Cicero kra\u00adl\u0131n b\u00f6yle bir giri\u015fimde bulunmay\u0131 istemesi i\u00e7in tamamen akl\u0131n\u0131 ka\u00e7\u0131rm\u0131\u015f ol\u00admas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade eder. Su\u00e7lamay\u0131 yapanlar\u0131n Deiotaros\u2019un siyasi men\u00adfaat pe\u015finde ko\u015fan torunu Castor ile kral\u0131n hekim k\u00f6lesi Phidippus oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Cicero davadan \u00f6nce Phidippus\u2019un iddialar\u0131n\u0131 dinlemi\u015ftir. Ci\u00adcero\u2019nun izleminine g\u00f6re k\u00f6le, Castor taraf\u0131ndan r\u00fc\u015fvetle yoldan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in kral hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczmece hik\u00e2yeler anlatmaktad\u0131r. Nitekim Phidippus\u2019un ifadesine g\u00f6re ilk suikast giri\u015fimi, Deiotaros\u2019\u0131n Caesar\u2019\u0131 \u015fereflendirmek ama\u00adc\u0131yla arma\u011fanlar sunmak istedi\u011fi \u00f6zel odada ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Odada silahl\u0131 adamlar\u0131n bulundu\u011funu iddia eden k\u00f6le, Ceasar\u2019\u0131n bu oda yerine yemek oda\u00ads\u0131na gitmeyi tercih etmesi nedeniyle kurulan tuzaktan kurtuldu\u011funu s\u00f6yle\u00admektedir. Cicero bu iddialar\u0131 komik bulmaktad\u0131r; bir zehirle kolayca halledi\u00adlebilecek bir giri\u015fim i\u00e7in \u00e7ok fazla \u00e7aba harcanmaktad\u0131r. \u0130kinci suikast giri\u015fimi\u00adnin ise ertesi g\u00fcn Caesar\u2019\u0131n yemekten sonra banyoya gitmek istedi\u011finde ger\u00ad\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi iddia edilmektedir. Ancak Caesar\u2019\u0131n bu kez de banyo yerine ya\u00adtak odas\u0131na gitmeyi tercih etmesi nedeniyle suikast giri\u015fiminin ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z ol\u00addu\u011fu \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclmektedir. Cicero su\u00e7lamay\u0131 bu adam banyoya bronzdan bir b\u00f6l\u00fck m\u00fc yerle\u015ftirdi ki, onlar banyodan yatak odas\u0131na ge\u00e7emediler<\/em> s\u00f6zleriyle ele\u015ftirmektedir. Di\u011fer yandan, s\u00f6zde t\u00fcm olaylara \u015fahit oldu\u011fu bilinen bu ki\u00ad\u015filerin Deiotaros taraf\u0131ndan el\u00e7i olarak Roma\u2019ya g\u00f6nderilmesinin tutars\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmektedir. Suikast su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra Deiotaros\u2019un Caesar kar\u00ad\u015f\u0131t\u0131 Caecilius\u2019a adam yollad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da iddia edilmektedir. Cicero Deiotaros\u2019un bu hareketini mazur g\u00f6stermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r, hem o\u011flu hem kendisi Caesar taraf\u0131n\u00addan kral olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015fken b\u00f6yle bir d\u00fc\u015fmanl\u0131k yapmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtir. Deiotaros\u2019un torunu Castor\u2019u da ele\u015ftiren Cicero onu nank\u00f6rl\u00fckle su\u00e7lamak\u00adtad\u0131r. Deiotaros\u2019un el\u00e7i heyeti \u00fcyelerinden biri olan Blesamius\u2019un ad\u0131 kulla\u00adnarak yap\u0131lan iddialardan bahsedilen k\u0131s\u0131m \u00f6zellikle dikkat \u00e7ekmektedir. Ni\u00adtekim Cicero asl\u0131nda bir iddiay\u0131 dile getirirken Caesar\u2019\u0131n tiran<\/em> olarak adland\u0131\u00adr\u0131lmas\u0131ndan, heykelinin kral heykellerinin aras\u0131na dikilmesinden bahsetmek\u00adtedir. Ancak ger\u00e7ekte kendisinin de i\u00e7ten i\u00e7e kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu \u2018iddialar\u0131\u2019, yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunman\u0131n devam\u0131nda derhal \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Savunman\u0131n sonu\u00e7 [conclusio] (91-95) k\u0131sm\u0131nda Caesar\u2019\u0131n verece\u011fi karar\u0131n \u00f6nemi \u00fczerinde du\u00adrulmaktad\u0131r. Cicero, olumsuz bir karar\u0131n \u015fimdiye dek Caesar taraf\u0131ndan affe\u00addilen ki\u015filerde bir korkuya sebebiyet verece\u011fi ifade edilmektedir. Son olarak Caesar verdi\u011fi kararla Deiotaros\u2019a y\u00fcz karas\u0131 bir leke ve ac\u0131nas\u0131 bir felaket getirecek ya da onu ba\u011f\u0131\u015flayarak hayat\u0131n\u0131 kurtaracakt\u0131r. Kitap, ana b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn bitmesini takiben, metne ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Son Notlar<\/em> (96-121) ve kitapta yararlan\u0131lan eserlerin listelendi\u011fi Kaynak\u00e7a<\/em> (122-126) b\u00f6l\u00fcmleri ile tamamlanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Cicero, Pro Rege Deiotaro Kral Deiotaros Savumas\u0131<\/em>\u2019n\u0131 M\u00d6 45 y\u0131l\u0131nda, eski bir devlet adam\u0131 ve deneyimli bir hatip olarak al\u0131\u015fk\u0131n oldu\u011fu ko\u015fullar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Cumhuriyete ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlerin giderek terk edilmeye ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edecek \u015fekilde; dictator <\/em>unvan\u0131na haiz bir yarg\u0131ca kar\u015f\u0131, yarg\u0131c\u0131n evinde, yine yarg\u0131c\u0131 \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs etmekle su\u00e7lanan bir kral\u0131n savun\u00admas\u0131n\u0131 yapmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Caesar\u2019\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde tedirginli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ifade eden Cicero \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc bir tav\u0131rla, Romal\u0131 olmayan, dava g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcrken huzurda dahi bu\u00adlunmayan kral\u0131, i\u015flemedi\u011fine inand\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7lardan aklamaya gayret g\u00f6stermi\u015f\u00adtir. T\u00fcm bu nedenlerle, olduk\u00e7a kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc bir \u015fekilde d\u00f6nemin siyasi or\u00adtam\u0131n\u0131 yans\u0131tan metnin, sadece bu \u00f6zelli\u011fiyle bile b\u00fcy\u00fck bir \u00f6neme haiz ol\u00addu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n

Akdeniz \u00dcniversitesi
\nAkdeniz Uygarl\u0131klar\u0131 Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Enstit\u00fcs\u00fc
\n<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

B. Deniz AT\u0130LLA (PhD)<\/strong>
\ndenizatilla@gmail.com<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/div>

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

<\/a>